Difference between revisions of "Death penalty"

From MXnet
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "2018 revision of the Catechism: : 2267 Recourse to the death penalty on the part of legitimate authority, following a fair trial, was long considered an appropriate response...")
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 04:34, 12 August 2018

2018 revision of the Catechism:

2267 Recourse to the death penalty on the part of legitimate authority, following a fair trial, was long considered an appropriate response to the gravity of certain crimes and an acceptable, albeit extreme, means of safeguarding the common good.
Today, however, there is an increasing awareness that the dignity of the person is not lost even after the commission of very serious crimes. In addition, a new understanding has emerged of the significance of penal sanctions imposed by the state. Lastly, more effective systems of detention have been developed, which ensure the due protection of citizens but, at the same time, do not definitively deprive the guilty of the possibility of redemption.
Consequently, the Church teaches, in the light of the Gospel, that “the death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person” (Francis, Discourse, Oct. 11, 2017), and she works with determination for its abolition worldwide.

Links