All the -isms - Revision history

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "— >" to "-->"

2022-12-10T10:22:54Z

Text replacement - "— >" to "-->"

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:22, 10 December 2022
Line 203:		Line 203:
	\|align="center"\|		\|align="center"\|
	\|		\|
	— >		-->

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "
2022-12-10T10:22:51Z

Text replacement - "<! —" to "<!--"

← Older revision Revision as of 12:22, 10 December 2022
Line 198: Line 198:

|}
|}

<! — blank entry
<!-- blank entry

|-
|-

|align="center"|
|align="center"|

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "--" to " — "

2022-12-10T10:04:13Z

Text replacement - "--" to " — "

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:04, 10 December 2022
Line 198:		Line 198:
	\|}		\|}

	<!-- blank entry		<! — blank entry
	\|-		\|-
	\|align="center"\|		\|align="center"\|
	\|align="center"\|		\|align="center"\|
	\|		\|
	-->		— >

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€”" to " — "

2022-12-10T09:33:36Z

Text replacement - "â€”" to " — "

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:33, 10 December 2022
Line 191:		Line 191:
	\|align="center"\|clericalism		\|align="center"\|clericalism
	\|align="center"\|Modernity		\|align="center"\|Modernity
	\|"The essence of clericalism is a certain mindset, a way of thinking about persons, relationships, and roles within church settings. The clericalist mindset assumes that priests (and, to a lesser degree, religious) are always the people in ~~chargeâ€”the~~ natural decision-makers, direction-setters, and initiators of action in the Church. Lay people make up a permanent ecclesiastical under-class. They are by nature passive and subservient, in need of clerical direction. ... [Clericalism] takes for granted that the clerical state is intrinsically superior to all others (i.e., the consecrated life, the married state, the single lay state in the world)."<ref>[http://www.catholic.com/magazine/articles/does-the-church-have-too-many-secrets "Does the Church Have Too Many Secrets?"]</ref>		\|"The essence of clericalism is a certain mindset, a way of thinking about persons, relationships, and roles within church settings. The clericalist mindset assumes that priests (and, to a lesser degree, religious) are always the people in charge — the natural decision-makers, direction-setters, and initiators of action in the Church. Lay people make up a permanent ecclesiastical under-class. They are by nature passive and subservient, in need of clerical direction. ... [Clericalism] takes for granted that the clerical state is intrinsically superior to all others (i.e., the consecrated life, the married state, the single lay state in the world)."<ref>[http://www.catholic.com/magazine/articles/does-the-church-have-too-many-secrets "Does the Church Have Too Many Secrets?"]</ref>
	\|-		\|-
	\|align="center"\|[[Triumphalism]]		\|align="center"\|[[Triumphalism]]

Mxmsj at 12:53, 23 March 2014

2014-03-23T12:53:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:53, 23 March 2014
Line 141:		Line 141:
	\|		\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|align="center"\|creationism		\|align="center"\|[[creationism]]
	\|align="center"\|		\|align="center"\|
	\|		\|

Mxmsj at 13:23, 14 August 2013

2013-08-14T13:23:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:23, 14 August 2013
Line 49:		Line 49:
	\|		\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|align="center"\|scientism		\|align="center"\|[[scientism]]
	\|align="center"\|		\|align="center"\|
	\|		\|

Mxmsj at 15:19, 21 July 2013

2013-07-21T15:19:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:19, 21 July 2013
Line 12:		Line 12:
	\|align="center"\|Enlightenment		\|align="center"\|Enlightenment
	\|Reason sets the boundaries to what can be believed.		\|Reason sets the boundaries to what can be believed.
			\|-
			\|align="center"\|humanism
			\|align="center"\|Renaissance
			\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|align="center"\|positivism		\|align="center"\|positivism
	\|align="center"\|		\|align="center"\|19th and 20th century
	\|		\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|align="center"\|linguistic criticism		\|align="center"\|linguistic criticism
	\|align="center"\|		\|align="center"\|20th century
	\|Better known as "linguistic analysis," but that doesn't fit the pigeonhole of "all the -isms."		\|Better known as "linguistic analysis," but that doesn't fit the pigeonhole of "all the -isms."
	\|-		\|-

Mxmsj at 15:17, 21 July 2013

2013-07-21T15:17:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:17, 21 July 2013
Line 34:		Line 34:
	\|-		\|-
	\|align="center"\|[[modernism]]		\|align="center"\|[[modernism]]
	\|align="center"\|"The Church must conform to modernity."		\|align="center"\|20th century
	\|		\|"The Church must conform to modernity."
	\|-		\|-
	\|align="center"\|[[egalitarianism]]		\|align="center"\|[[egalitarianism]]

Mxmsj at 15:16, 21 July 2013

2013-07-21T15:16:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:16, 21 July 2013
Line 33:		Line 33:
	\|		\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|align="center"\|modernism		\|align="center"\|[[modernism]]
	\|align="center"\|		\|align="center"\|"The Church must conform to modernity."
	\|		\|
	\|-		\|-

Mxmsj at 13:28, 18 July 2013

2013-07-18T13:28:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:28, 18 July 2013
Line 190:		Line 190:
	\|-		\|-
	\|align="center"\|[[Triumphalism]]		\|align="center"\|[[Triumphalism]]
	\|align="center"\|Triumphalists wrongly attribute to themselves the glory of Jesus and the saints in Heaven. As a consequence, they fail to fight well in the battles that God has given them to fight. Their sin of presumption prevents them from preaching the gospel effectively.		\|align="center"\|Nineteenth and twentieth centuries
	\|		\|Triumphalists wrongly attribute to themselves the glory of Jesus and the saints in Heaven. As a consequence, they fail to fight well in the battles that God has given them to fight. Their sin of presumption prevents them from preaching the gospel effectively.
	\|}		\|}