Death penalty - Revision history

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€œ" to "“"

2022-12-10T09:21:30Z

Text replacement - "â€œ" to "“"

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:21, 10 December 2022
Line 5:		Line 5:
	: Today, however, there is an increasing awareness that the dignity of the person is not lost even after the commission of very serious crimes. In addition, a new understanding has emerged of the significance of penal sanctions imposed by the state. Lastly, more effective systems of detention have been developed, which ensure the due protection of citizens but, at the same time, do not definitively deprive the guilty of the possibility of redemption.		: Today, however, there is an increasing awareness that the dignity of the person is not lost even after the commission of very serious crimes. In addition, a new understanding has emerged of the significance of penal sanctions imposed by the state. Lastly, more effective systems of detention have been developed, which ensure the due protection of citizens but, at the same time, do not definitively deprive the guilty of the possibility of redemption.

	: Consequently, the Church teaches, in the light of the Gospel, that ~~â€œthe~~ death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person” (Francis, Discourse, Oct. 11, 2017), and she works with determination for its abolition worldwide.		: Consequently, the Church teaches, in the light of the Gospel, that “the death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person” (Francis, Discourse, Oct. 11, 2017), and she works with determination for its abolition worldwide.

	== Links ==		== Links ==

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€" to "”"

2022-12-10T09:20:39Z

Text replacement - "â€" to "”"

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:20, 10 December 2022
Line 5:		Line 5:
	: Today, however, there is an increasing awareness that the dignity of the person is not lost even after the commission of very serious crimes. In addition, a new understanding has emerged of the significance of penal sanctions imposed by the state. Lastly, more effective systems of detention have been developed, which ensure the due protection of citizens but, at the same time, do not definitively deprive the guilty of the possibility of redemption.		: Today, however, there is an increasing awareness that the dignity of the person is not lost even after the commission of very serious crimes. In addition, a new understanding has emerged of the significance of penal sanctions imposed by the state. Lastly, more effective systems of detention have been developed, which ensure the due protection of citizens but, at the same time, do not definitively deprive the guilty of the possibility of redemption.

	: Consequently, the Church teaches, in the light of the Gospel, that â€œthe death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the ~~personâ€~~ (Francis, Discourse, Oct. 11, 2017), and she works with determination for its abolition worldwide.		: Consequently, the Church teaches, in the light of the Gospel, that â€œthe death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person” (Francis, Discourse, Oct. 11, 2017), and she works with determination for its abolition worldwide.

	== Links ==		== Links ==

Mxmsj: Created page with "2018 revision of the Catechism: : 2267 Recourse to the death penalty on the part of legitimate authority, following a fair trial, was long considered an appropriate response..."

2018-08-12T08:34:28Z

Created page with "2018 revision of the Catechism: : 2267 Recourse to the death penalty on the part of legitimate authority, following a fair trial, was long considered an appropriate response..."

New page

2018 revision of the Catechism:

: 2267 Recourse to the death penalty on the part of legitimate authority, following a fair trial, was long considered an appropriate response to the gravity of certain crimes and an acceptable, albeit extreme, means of safeguarding the common good.

: Today, however, there is an increasing awareness that the dignity of the person is not lost even after the commission of very serious crimes. In addition, a new understanding has emerged of the significance of penal sanctions imposed by the state. Lastly, more effective systems of detention have been developed, which ensure the due protection of citizens but, at the same time, do not definitively deprive the guilty of the possibility of redemption.

: Consequently, the Church teaches, in the light of the Gospel, that â€œthe death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the personâ€ (Francis, Discourse, Oct. 11, 2017), and she works with determination for its abolition worldwide.

== Links ==
* [http://jimmyakin.com/2018/08/understanding-the-catechisms-death-penalty-revision.html Jimmy Akin, "Understanding the Catechism's Death Penalty Revision"]

[[Category:Ethics]]

Death penalty - Revision history

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€œ" to "“"

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€" to "”"

Mxmsj: Created page with "2018 revision of the Catechism: : 2267 Recourse to the death penalty on the part of legitimate authority, following a fair trial, was long considered an appropriate response..."

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€" to "”"