Kolbe Center - Revision history

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "--" to " — "

2022-12-10T10:04:16Z

Text replacement - "--" to " — "

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:04, 10 December 2022
Line 18:		Line 18:

	<div style="margin-left:2em"><br>		<div style="margin-left:2em"><br>
	~~----~~		— —
	</div><br>		</div><br>

Line 42:		Line 42:

	<div style="margin-left:2em"><br>		<div style="margin-left:2em"><br>
	~~----~~		— —
	</div><br>		</div><br>

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€”" to " — "

2022-12-10T09:29:41Z

Text replacement - "â€”" to " — "

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:29, 10 December 2022
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:: If evolution cannot be found in Christ, then it is not redeemable and should be discarded as a work of the spirit of antichrist.		:: If evolution cannot be found in Christ, then it is not redeemable and should be discarded as a work of the spirit of antichrist.

	:: Now something needs to be said regarding the statements of the popes and prelates that place evolution and the teaching of Chardin in so favorable a light. Each of these men has a place in the hierarchy of the Church. They are in the line of authority established by God that goes from heaven down to earth. But that position or place in the hierarchy alone does not give every word or action or decision they make an immediate share in God's authority. In order for this to happen, these words, actions and decisions must be somehow found in the Book of the Incarnate Word. In other words, they must have some pedigree, some genealogy, a Tradition that traces them back to Christ and His Apostles. In every authoritative statement of the Church's Magisterium, there is always a presentation of the tradition behind the teaching. For example, when defining the Immaculate Conception, Pope Pius IX spent no little time and space tracing the doctrine back to the Scriptures and Tradition through the Fathers, Doctors and the Sacred Liturgy of the Church. Then Pope Pius made his immemorial pronouncement. Pope John Paul did likewise when he ruled on whether women could be ordained priests. This is what must be done in order for any statement to witness with any authority to the Book of the Incarnate Word. Pope John Paul presented no pedigree, no genealogy or Tradition in his statement on evolution. No mention was made of the creed of Pope Pelagius I, the Fourth Lateran Council, the First Vatican Council, Pope Leo XIII and other authoritative Magisterial teachings on the origin of man and the created universe. Thus, the saying of Melchior Cano, the great Dominican theologian at the sixteenth-century Council of Trent, comes to mind: “Those who blindly and indiscriminately defend every decision of the supreme Pontiff are the very ones who do most to undermine the authority of the Holy ~~Seeâ€”they~~ destroy instead of strengthening its foundations” (as quoted by George Weigel in Witness to Hope, p. 15). Since Pope John Paul II's statement on evolution has no genealogy, we are safe in considering it merely as the opinion of a Pope at the time of his speaking to a gathering of modern scientists.		:: Now something needs to be said regarding the statements of the popes and prelates that place evolution and the teaching of Chardin in so favorable a light. Each of these men has a place in the hierarchy of the Church. They are in the line of authority established by God that goes from heaven down to earth. But that position or place in the hierarchy alone does not give every word or action or decision they make an immediate share in God's authority. In order for this to happen, these words, actions and decisions must be somehow found in the Book of the Incarnate Word. In other words, they must have some pedigree, some genealogy, a Tradition that traces them back to Christ and His Apostles. In every authoritative statement of the Church's Magisterium, there is always a presentation of the tradition behind the teaching. For example, when defining the Immaculate Conception, Pope Pius IX spent no little time and space tracing the doctrine back to the Scriptures and Tradition through the Fathers, Doctors and the Sacred Liturgy of the Church. Then Pope Pius made his immemorial pronouncement. Pope John Paul did likewise when he ruled on whether women could be ordained priests. This is what must be done in order for any statement to witness with any authority to the Book of the Incarnate Word. Pope John Paul presented no pedigree, no genealogy or Tradition in his statement on evolution. No mention was made of the creed of Pope Pelagius I, the Fourth Lateran Council, the First Vatican Council, Pope Leo XIII and other authoritative Magisterial teachings on the origin of man and the created universe. Thus, the saying of Melchior Cano, the great Dominican theologian at the sixteenth-century Council of Trent, comes to mind: “Those who blindly and indiscriminately defend every decision of the supreme Pontiff are the very ones who do most to undermine the authority of the Holy See — they destroy instead of strengthening its foundations” (as quoted by George Weigel in Witness to Hope, p. 15). Since Pope John Paul II's statement on evolution has no genealogy, we are safe in considering it merely as the opinion of a Pope at the time of his speaking to a gathering of modern scientists.

	:; [http://www.kolbecenter.org/the-traditional-catholic-doctrine-of-creation/ "The Traditional Catholic Doctrine of Creation."]		:; [http://www.kolbecenter.org/the-traditional-catholic-doctrine-of-creation/ "The Traditional Catholic Doctrine of Creation."]

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€œ" to "“"

2022-12-10T09:20:46Z

Text replacement - "â€œ" to "“"

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€" to "”"

2022-12-10T09:20:45Z

Text replacement - "â€" to "”"

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€™" to "'"

2022-12-10T09:20:41Z

Text replacement - "â€™" to "'"

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:20, 10 December 2022
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:: If evolution cannot be found in Christ, then it is not redeemable and should be discarded as a work of the spirit of antichrist.		:: If evolution cannot be found in Christ, then it is not redeemable and should be discarded as a work of the spirit of antichrist.

	:: Now something needs to be said regarding the statements of the popes and prelates that place evolution and the teaching of Chardin in so favorable a light. Each of these men has a place in the hierarchy of the Church. They are in the line of authority established by God that goes from heaven down to earth. But that position or place in the hierarchy alone does not give every word or action or decision they make an immediate share in ~~Godâ€™s~~ authority. In order for this to happen, these words, actions and decisions must be somehow found in the Book of the Incarnate Word. In other words, they must have some pedigree, some genealogy, a Tradition that traces them back to Christ and His Apostles. In every authoritative statement of the ~~Churchâ€™s~~ Magisterium, there is always a presentation of the tradition behind the teaching. For example, when defining the Immaculate Conception, Pope Pius IX spent no little time and space tracing the doctrine back to the Scriptures and Tradition through the Fathers, Doctors and the Sacred Liturgy of the Church. Then Pope Pius made his immemorial pronouncement. Pope John Paul did likewise when he ruled on whether women could be ordained priests. This is what must be done in order for any statement to witness with any authority to the Book of the Incarnate Word. Pope John Paul presented no pedigree, no genealogy or Tradition in his statement on evolution. No mention was made of the creed of Pope Pelagius I, the Fourth Lateran Council, the First Vatican Council, Pope Leo XIII and other authoritative Magisterial teachings on the origin of man and the created universe. Thus, the saying of Melchior Cano, the great Dominican theologian at the sixteenth-century Council of Trent, comes to mind: â€œThose who blindly and indiscriminately defend every decision of the supreme Pontiff are the very ones who do most to undermine the authority of the Holy Seeâ€”they destroy instead of strengthening its foundationsâ€ (as quoted by George Weigel in Witness to Hope, p. 15). Since Pope John Paul ~~IIâ€™s~~ statement on evolution has no genealogy, we are safe in considering it merely as the opinion of a Pope at the time of his speaking to a gathering of modern scientists.		:: Now something needs to be said regarding the statements of the popes and prelates that place evolution and the teaching of Chardin in so favorable a light. Each of these men has a place in the hierarchy of the Church. They are in the line of authority established by God that goes from heaven down to earth. But that position or place in the hierarchy alone does not give every word or action or decision they make an immediate share in God's authority. In order for this to happen, these words, actions and decisions must be somehow found in the Book of the Incarnate Word. In other words, they must have some pedigree, some genealogy, a Tradition that traces them back to Christ and His Apostles. In every authoritative statement of the Church's Magisterium, there is always a presentation of the tradition behind the teaching. For example, when defining the Immaculate Conception, Pope Pius IX spent no little time and space tracing the doctrine back to the Scriptures and Tradition through the Fathers, Doctors and the Sacred Liturgy of the Church. Then Pope Pius made his immemorial pronouncement. Pope John Paul did likewise when he ruled on whether women could be ordained priests. This is what must be done in order for any statement to witness with any authority to the Book of the Incarnate Word. Pope John Paul presented no pedigree, no genealogy or Tradition in his statement on evolution. No mention was made of the creed of Pope Pelagius I, the Fourth Lateran Council, the First Vatican Council, Pope Leo XIII and other authoritative Magisterial teachings on the origin of man and the created universe. Thus, the saying of Melchior Cano, the great Dominican theologian at the sixteenth-century Council of Trent, comes to mind: â€œThose who blindly and indiscriminately defend every decision of the supreme Pontiff are the very ones who do most to undermine the authority of the Holy Seeâ€”they destroy instead of strengthening its foundationsâ€ (as quoted by George Weigel in Witness to Hope, p. 15). Since Pope John Paul II's statement on evolution has no genealogy, we are safe in considering it merely as the opinion of a Pope at the time of his speaking to a gathering of modern scientists.

	:; [http://www.kolbecenter.org/the-traditional-catholic-doctrine-of-creation/ "The Traditional Catholic Doctrine of Creation."]		:; [http://www.kolbecenter.org/the-traditional-catholic-doctrine-of-creation/ "The Traditional Catholic Doctrine of Creation."]
Line 25:		Line 25:
	:: Its reply to Question II established that Genesis contains â€œstories of events which really happened, which correspond with historical reality and objective truth,â€ not â€œlegends, historical in part and fictitious in part.â€ In short, the PBC definitively excluded the possibility that even a part of the Genesis 1-3 narrative could be fictitious and non-historical.		:: Its reply to Question II established that Genesis contains â€œstories of events which really happened, which correspond with historical reality and objective truth,â€ not â€œlegends, historical in part and fictitious in part.â€ In short, the PBC definitively excluded the possibility that even a part of the Genesis 1-3 narrative could be fictitious and non-historical.

	:: The ~~PBCâ€™s~~ answer to Question III established that the literal and historical truth of the following facts cannot be called into question:		:: The PBC's answer to Question III established that the literal and historical truth of the following facts cannot be called into question:

	::: 1) â€œThe creation of all things wrought by God in the beginning of timeâ€		::: 1) â€œThe creation of all things wrought by God in the beginning of timeâ€

Mxmsj at 11:06, 31 December 2014

2014-12-31T11:06:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:06, 31 December 2014
Line 66:		Line 66:

	::		::

			[[Category:Cosmology]]
			[[Category:Traditionalism]]

Mxmsj at 14:26, 24 December 2014

2014-12-24T14:26:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:26, 24 December 2014
Line 37:		Line 37:
	:::: Comment: This excludes any process in the formation of man and requires that the creation of man was immediate and instantaneous.		:::: Comment: This excludes any process in the formation of man and requires that the creation of man was immediate and instantaneous.

	3) â€œThe formation of the first woman from the first manâ€		::: 3) â€œThe formation of the first woman from the first manâ€

	:::: Comment: This, too, excludes any process in the formation of the first woman and requires that the creation of Eve was immediate and instantaneous.		:::: Comment: This, too, excludes any process in the formation of the first woman and requires that the creation of Eve was immediate and instantaneous.

Mxmsj: /* From the Kolbe center website */

2014-12-23T17:50:08Z

From the Kolbe center website

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:50, 23 December 2014
Line 17:		Line 17:
	:: Notice that the plain sense of the â€œsacred history of Genesisâ€ is so sure a guide to the truth of the creation and early history of the world and of man that the council fathers direct the pastor to read the sacred history so that he can â€œeasilyâ€ make himself familiar with the facts. â€œLastlyâ€ means God created man last. There has been no further creation since the creation of Adam and Eve. Only variation within limits established during the six days. ...		:: Notice that the plain sense of the â€œsacred history of Genesisâ€ is so sure a guide to the truth of the creation and early history of the world and of man that the council fathers direct the pastor to read the sacred history so that he can â€œeasilyâ€ make himself familiar with the facts. â€œLastlyâ€ means God created man last. There has been no further creation since the creation of Adam and Eve. Only variation within limits established during the six days. ...

	<div style="margin-left:~~4em~~">		<div style="margin-left:2em"><br>
	----		----
	</div>		</div><br>

	:: Its reply to Question I established that the literal historical sense of the first three chapters of Genesis cannot be called into question.		:: Its reply to Question I established that the literal historical sense of the first three chapters of Genesis cannot be called into question.
Line 41:		Line 41:
	:::: Comment: This, too, excludes any process in the formation of the first woman and requires that the creation of Eve was immediate and instantaneous.		:::: Comment: This, too, excludes any process in the formation of the first woman and requires that the creation of Eve was immediate and instantaneous.

	<div style="margin-left:~~4em~~">		<div style="margin-left:2em"><br>
	----		----
	</div>		</div><br>

	:: Moreover, by embracing evolution as the â€œonly scientificâ€ explanation for the origin of the different kinds of living things, theistic evolutionists not only jettison the constant teaching of the Fathers, Doctors, Popes and Councils; they also unintentionally impugn the goodness and wisdom of God.		:: Moreover, by embracing evolution as the â€œonly scientificâ€ explanation for the origin of the different kinds of living things, theistic evolutionists not only jettison the constant teaching of the Fathers, Doctors, Popes and Councils; they also unintentionally impugn the goodness and wisdom of God.

Mxmsj at 17:49, 23 December 2014

2014-12-23T17:49:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:49, 23 December 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== From the Kolbe center website ==		== From the [http://www.kolbecenter.org/ Kolbe center website] ==

	:; []		:; [http://www.kolbecenter.org/contact-us/ Kolbe Center Mission Statement]

	:: The Kolbe Center for the Study of Creation is a Roman Catholic lay apostolate dedicated to glorifying the Most Holy Trinity by proclaiming the truth about the origins of man and the universe. The Kolbe Center seeks to educate the public, particularly within the Catholic Church, in the truth of creation as revealed in Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition and as confirmed by the findings of modern science. With the help of experts in the fields of theology, philosophy, and natural science, the Kolbe Center also seeks to show the superiority of special creation over all forms of molecules-to-man evolution as an explanation of the origins of man and the universe. According to the molecules-to-man, or macro-evolutionary, theory of origins, all living things are descended from non-living matter. During billions of years, this non-living matter changed into all of the different kinds of living organisms. According to the special creation model of origins on the other hand, God created the various kinds of living things, including man, by divine fiat and later, after the Fall, engineered a global flood that produced most of the â€œfossil record.â€		:: The Kolbe Center for the Study of Creation is a Roman Catholic lay apostolate dedicated to glorifying the Most Holy Trinity by proclaiming the truth about the origins of man and the universe. The Kolbe Center seeks to educate the public, particularly within the Catholic Church, in the truth of creation as revealed in Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition and as confirmed by the findings of modern science. With the help of experts in the fields of theology, philosophy, and natural science, the Kolbe Center also seeks to show the superiority of special creation over all forms of molecules-to-man evolution as an explanation of the origins of man and the universe. According to the molecules-to-man, or macro-evolutionary, theory of origins, all living things are descended from non-living matter. During billions of years, this non-living matter changed into all of the different kinds of living organisms. According to the special creation model of origins on the other hand, God created the various kinds of living things, including man, by divine fiat and later, after the Fall, engineered a global flood that produced most of the â€œfossil record.â€

Mxmsj: /* From the Kolbe center website */

2014-12-23T14:11:44Z

From the Kolbe center website

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 23 December 2014
Line 17:		Line 17:
	:: Notice that the plain sense of the â€œsacred history of Genesisâ€ is so sure a guide to the truth of the creation and early history of the world and of man that the council fathers direct the pastor to read the sacred history so that he can â€œeasilyâ€ make himself familiar with the facts. â€œLastlyâ€ means God created man last. There has been no further creation since the creation of Adam and Eve. Only variation within limits established during the six days. ...		:: Notice that the plain sense of the â€œsacred history of Genesisâ€ is so sure a guide to the truth of the creation and early history of the world and of man that the council fathers direct the pastor to read the sacred history so that he can â€œeasilyâ€ make himself familiar with the facts. â€œLastlyâ€ means God created man last. There has been no further creation since the creation of Adam and Eve. Only variation within limits established during the six days. ...

	:: ----		<div style="margin-left:4em">
			----
			</div>

	:: Its reply to Question I established that the literal historical sense of the first three chapters of Genesis cannot be called into question.		:: Its reply to Question I established that the literal historical sense of the first three chapters of Genesis cannot be called into question.
Line 39:		Line 41:
	:::: Comment: This, too, excludes any process in the formation of the first woman and requires that the creation of Eve was immediate and instantaneous.		:::: Comment: This, too, excludes any process in the formation of the first woman and requires that the creation of Eve was immediate and instantaneous.

	:: ----		<div style="margin-left:4em">
			----
			</div>

	:: Moreover, by embracing evolution as the â€œonly scientificâ€ explanation for the origin of the different kinds of living things, theistic evolutionists not only jettison the constant teaching of the Fathers, Doctors, Popes and Councils; they also unintentionally impugn the goodness and wisdom of God.		:: Moreover, by embracing evolution as the â€œonly scientificâ€ explanation for the origin of the different kinds of living things, theistic evolutionists not only jettison the constant teaching of the Fathers, Doctors, Popes and Councils; they also unintentionally impugn the goodness and wisdom of God.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:20, 10 December 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:; [http://www.kolbecenter.org/contact-us/ Kolbe Center Mission Statement]		:; [http://www.kolbecenter.org/contact-us/ Kolbe Center Mission Statement]

	:: The Kolbe Center for the Study of Creation is a Roman Catholic lay apostolate dedicated to glorifying the Most Holy Trinity by proclaiming the truth about the origins of man and the universe. The Kolbe Center seeks to educate the public, particularly within the Catholic Church, in the truth of creation as revealed in Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition and as confirmed by the findings of modern science. With the help of experts in the fields of theology, philosophy, and natural science, the Kolbe Center also seeks to show the superiority of special creation over all forms of molecules-to-man evolution as an explanation of the origins of man and the universe. According to the molecules-to-man, or macro-evolutionary, theory of origins, all living things are descended from non-living matter. During billions of years, this non-living matter changed into all of the different kinds of living organisms. According to the special creation model of origins on the other hand, God created the various kinds of living things, including man, by divine fiat and later, after the Fall, engineered a global flood that produced most of the ~~â€œfossil~~ record.”		:: The Kolbe Center for the Study of Creation is a Roman Catholic lay apostolate dedicated to glorifying the Most Holy Trinity by proclaiming the truth about the origins of man and the universe. The Kolbe Center seeks to educate the public, particularly within the Catholic Church, in the truth of creation as revealed in Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition and as confirmed by the findings of modern science. With the help of experts in the fields of theology, philosophy, and natural science, the Kolbe Center also seeks to show the superiority of special creation over all forms of molecules-to-man evolution as an explanation of the origins of man and the universe. According to the molecules-to-man, or macro-evolutionary, theory of origins, all living things are descended from non-living matter. During billions of years, this non-living matter changed into all of the different kinds of living organisms. According to the special creation model of origins on the other hand, God created the various kinds of living things, including man, by divine fiat and later, after the Fall, engineered a global flood that produced most of the “fossil record.”

	:; [http://www.kolbecenter.org/christ-the-exemplar-cause-of-creation-eliminates-the-possibility-of-evolution/ "Christ, the Exemplar Cause of Creation, Excludes the Possibility of Evolution."]		:; [http://www.kolbecenter.org/christ-the-exemplar-cause-of-creation-eliminates-the-possibility-of-evolution/ "Christ, the Exemplar Cause of Creation, Excludes the Possibility of Evolution."]
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:: If evolution cannot be found in Christ, then it is not redeemable and should be discarded as a work of the spirit of antichrist.		:: If evolution cannot be found in Christ, then it is not redeemable and should be discarded as a work of the spirit of antichrist.

	:: Now something needs to be said regarding the statements of the popes and prelates that place evolution and the teaching of Chardin in so favorable a light. Each of these men has a place in the hierarchy of the Church. They are in the line of authority established by God that goes from heaven down to earth. But that position or place in the hierarchy alone does not give every word or action or decision they make an immediate share in God's authority. In order for this to happen, these words, actions and decisions must be somehow found in the Book of the Incarnate Word. In other words, they must have some pedigree, some genealogy, a Tradition that traces them back to Christ and His Apostles. In every authoritative statement of the Church's Magisterium, there is always a presentation of the tradition behind the teaching. For example, when defining the Immaculate Conception, Pope Pius IX spent no little time and space tracing the doctrine back to the Scriptures and Tradition through the Fathers, Doctors and the Sacred Liturgy of the Church. Then Pope Pius made his immemorial pronouncement. Pope John Paul did likewise when he ruled on whether women could be ordained priests. This is what must be done in order for any statement to witness with any authority to the Book of the Incarnate Word. Pope John Paul presented no pedigree, no genealogy or Tradition in his statement on evolution. No mention was made of the creed of Pope Pelagius I, the Fourth Lateran Council, the First Vatican Council, Pope Leo XIII and other authoritative Magisterial teachings on the origin of man and the created universe. Thus, the saying of Melchior Cano, the great Dominican theologian at the sixteenth-century Council of Trent, comes to mind: ~~â€œThose~~ who blindly and indiscriminately defend every decision of the supreme Pontiff are the very ones who do most to undermine the authority of the Holy Seeâ€”they destroy instead of strengthening its foundations” (as quoted by George Weigel in Witness to Hope, p. 15). Since Pope John Paul II's statement on evolution has no genealogy, we are safe in considering it merely as the opinion of a Pope at the time of his speaking to a gathering of modern scientists.		:: Now something needs to be said regarding the statements of the popes and prelates that place evolution and the teaching of Chardin in so favorable a light. Each of these men has a place in the hierarchy of the Church. They are in the line of authority established by God that goes from heaven down to earth. But that position or place in the hierarchy alone does not give every word or action or decision they make an immediate share in God's authority. In order for this to happen, these words, actions and decisions must be somehow found in the Book of the Incarnate Word. In other words, they must have some pedigree, some genealogy, a Tradition that traces them back to Christ and His Apostles. In every authoritative statement of the Church's Magisterium, there is always a presentation of the tradition behind the teaching. For example, when defining the Immaculate Conception, Pope Pius IX spent no little time and space tracing the doctrine back to the Scriptures and Tradition through the Fathers, Doctors and the Sacred Liturgy of the Church. Then Pope Pius made his immemorial pronouncement. Pope John Paul did likewise when he ruled on whether women could be ordained priests. This is what must be done in order for any statement to witness with any authority to the Book of the Incarnate Word. Pope John Paul presented no pedigree, no genealogy or Tradition in his statement on evolution. No mention was made of the creed of Pope Pelagius I, the Fourth Lateran Council, the First Vatican Council, Pope Leo XIII and other authoritative Magisterial teachings on the origin of man and the created universe. Thus, the saying of Melchior Cano, the great Dominican theologian at the sixteenth-century Council of Trent, comes to mind: “Those who blindly and indiscriminately defend every decision of the supreme Pontiff are the very ones who do most to undermine the authority of the Holy Seeâ€”they destroy instead of strengthening its foundations” (as quoted by George Weigel in Witness to Hope, p. 15). Since Pope John Paul II's statement on evolution has no genealogy, we are safe in considering it merely as the opinion of a Pope at the time of his speaking to a gathering of modern scientists.

	:; [http://www.kolbecenter.org/the-traditional-catholic-doctrine-of-creation/ "The Traditional Catholic Doctrine of Creation."]		:; [http://www.kolbecenter.org/the-traditional-catholic-doctrine-of-creation/ "The Traditional Catholic Doctrine of Creation."]

	:: Notice that the plain sense of the ~~â€œsacred~~ history of Genesis” is so sure a guide to the truth of the creation and early history of the world and of man that the council fathers direct the pastor to read the sacred history so that he can ~~â€œeasily”~~ make himself familiar with the facts. ~~â€œLastly”~~ means God created man last. There has been no further creation since the creation of Adam and Eve. Only variation within limits established during the six days. ...		:: Notice that the plain sense of the “sacred history of Genesis” is so sure a guide to the truth of the creation and early history of the world and of man that the council fathers direct the pastor to read the sacred history so that he can “easily” make himself familiar with the facts. “Lastly” means God created man last. There has been no further creation since the creation of Adam and Eve. Only variation within limits established during the six days. ...

	<div style="margin-left:2em"><br>		<div style="margin-left:2em"><br>
Line 23:		Line 23:
	:: Its reply to Question I established that the literal historical sense of the first three chapters of Genesis cannot be called into question.		:: Its reply to Question I established that the literal historical sense of the first three chapters of Genesis cannot be called into question.

	:: Its reply to Question II established that Genesis contains ~~â€œstories~~ of events which really happened, which correspond with historical reality and objective truth,” not ~~â€œlegends~~, historical in part and fictitious in part.” In short, the PBC definitively excluded the possibility that even a part of the Genesis 1-3 narrative could be fictitious and non-historical.		:: Its reply to Question II established that Genesis contains “stories of events which really happened, which correspond with historical reality and objective truth,” not “legends, historical in part and fictitious in part.” In short, the PBC definitively excluded the possibility that even a part of the Genesis 1-3 narrative could be fictitious and non-historical.

	:: The PBC's answer to Question III established that the literal and historical truth of the following facts cannot be called into question:		:: The PBC's answer to Question III established that the literal and historical truth of the following facts cannot be called into question:

	::: 1) ~~â€œThe~~ creation of all things wrought by God in the beginning of time”		::: 1) “The creation of all things wrought by God in the beginning of time”

	:::: Comment:		:::: Comment:

	::::: This passage upholds the Lateran IV doctrine that all things were created by God ~~â€œin~~ the beginning of time.”		::::: This passage upholds the Lateran IV doctrine that all things were created by God “in the beginning of time.”

	::: 2) ~~â€œThe~~ special creation of man”		::: 2) “The special creation of man”

	:::: Comment: This excludes any process in the formation of man and requires that the creation of man was immediate and instantaneous.		:::: Comment: This excludes any process in the formation of man and requires that the creation of man was immediate and instantaneous.

	::: 3) ~~â€œThe~~ formation of the first woman from the first man”		::: 3) “The formation of the first woman from the first man”

	:::: Comment: This, too, excludes any process in the formation of the first woman and requires that the creation of Eve was immediate and instantaneous.		:::: Comment: This, too, excludes any process in the formation of the first woman and requires that the creation of Eve was immediate and instantaneous.
Line 45:		Line 45:
	</div><br>		</div><br>

	:: Moreover, by embracing evolution as the ~~â€œonly~~ scientific” explanation for the origin of the different kinds of living things, theistic evolutionists not only jettison the constant teaching of the Fathers, Doctors, Popes and Councils; they also unintentionally impugn the goodness and wisdom of God.		:: Moreover, by embracing evolution as the “only scientific” explanation for the origin of the different kinds of living things, theistic evolutionists not only jettison the constant teaching of the Fathers, Doctors, Popes and Councils; they also unintentionally impugn the goodness and wisdom of God.

	:; []		:; []

Kolbe Center - Revision history

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "--" to " — "

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€”" to " — "

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€œ" to "“"

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€" to "”"

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€™" to "'"

Mxmsj at 11:06, 31 December 2014

Mxmsj at 14:26, 24 December 2014

Mxmsj: /* From the Kolbe center website */

Mxmsj at 17:49, 23 December 2014

Mxmsj: /* From the Kolbe center website */

Mxmsj: Text replacement - "â€" to "”"