From: Alexander Bartolich <alexander.bartol...@gmx.at>
Newsgroups: alt.usenet.peering,news.admin.peering,news.software.nntp
Subject: Re: Propose of usenet
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 20:40:08 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <h2oen8$tc2$1@news.albasani.net>
["Followup-To:" header set to news.software.nntp.]
Kelb tal-Fenek wrote:
> Curt Welch wrote:
>> peer <p...@gallaxy.ath.cx> wrote:
>>> Form of what usenet must be in future and present
>>
>> Already tried and failed 10 years ago...
>>
>> http://www.usenet2.org/
>
> It was a great idea; maybe we should take a look at it again.
Usenet II : The Czar controls all news servers.
Usenet III: The Czar controls all news readers.
Usenet IV : The Czar controls all news users.
Usenet V : Gains sentience, starts nuclear war.
Because we need killfiles that actually kill.
From: Ray Banana <rayban@banana.shacknet.nu>
Subject: Re: Bulk moderator vacancies anouncements
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:15:48 +0100
Message-ID: <874op1mf4b.fsf@feeder.eternal-september.org>
...
BTW, I just did a bit of research on the problem of bouncing submissions
to moderated groups and these are the figures for the past 30 days [3]:
Total number of postings: 181,399
Postings to moderated groups: 2,768
bounced postings to moderators: 4
[3] Based on the logs of news.eternal-september.org for the Big 8, alt.*
and regional hierarchies like uk.*, fr.*, de.*, it.*, etc.