Amoris Laetitia: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with ":; Edward Peters :: Shall we be VERY clear on something? Holy Communion is WITHHELD from divorced-and-remarried Catholics under Canon 915 (as a function of one’s publicly c...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
:; Edward Peters | :; [http://www.canonlaw.info/petersfaculty.htm Edward Peters] | ||
:: Shall we be VERY clear on something? Holy Communion is WITHHELD from divorced-and-remarried Catholics under Canon 915 (as a function of one’s publicly contrarian status) and not because of Canon 916 (which looks to the personal culpability one might actually incur, or not, for one’s actions). Nothing in canon law and, patently, NOTHING IN AMORIS LAETITIA allows ministers of holy Communion to disregard current Church discipline regard to Canon 915. Absolutely nothing. | :: Shall we be VERY clear on something? Holy Communion is WITHHELD from divorced-and-remarried Catholics under Canon 915 (as a function of one’s publicly contrarian status) and not because of Canon 916 (which looks to the personal culpability one might actually incur, or not, for one’s actions). Nothing in canon law and, patently, NOTHING IN AMORIS LAETITIA allows ministers of holy Communion to disregard current Church discipline regard to Canon 915. Absolutely nothing. | ||
Revision as of 11:45, 10 April 2016
- Shall we be VERY clear on something? Holy Communion is WITHHELD from divorced-and-remarried Catholics under Canon 915 (as a function of one’s publicly contrarian status) and not because of Canon 916 (which looks to the personal culpability one might actually incur, or not, for one’s actions). Nothing in canon law and, patently, NOTHING IN AMORIS LAETITIA allows ministers of holy Communion to disregard current Church discipline regard to Canon 915. Absolutely nothing.