The Rite: Difference between revisions

From Cor ad Cor
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 30: Line 30:
:'''All:'''  Amen.
:'''All:'''  Amen.
:::''The Celebrant anoints the child on the breast with the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_of_catechumens Oil of Catechumens.]''
:::''The Celebrant anoints the child on the breast with the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_of_catechumens Oil of Catechumens.]''
== The Book ==
* Exorcism is hard work.
* It's not magic.
* People really suffer; people really find relief.


== The Movie vs. The Book ==
== The Movie vs. The Book ==

Revision as of 18:06, 4 November 2011

Some presuppostions

There is, of course, a kernel of truth in the story: the Church does teach that we have supernatural enemies (fallen angels--devils, and demons) and that people are capable of choosing Hell (the souls of the damned); it does teach that Jesus can use ordained ministers (deacons, priests, or bishops) to drive evil spirits out of the souls of God's children; the holiness and wisdom of the exorcist does make a difference in the efficacy of the rite--in obedience to the Scripture passage, "This kind can only be driven out by prayer [and fasting]," the exorcist often fasts and prays continually until the matter is resolved; there is a renewed emphasis on the need for the ordained to be trained as exorcists so that they are available when needed.

Exorcism is NOT a contest between the exorcist and the unclean spirits. It is the application of Jesus' victory on the Cross to a suffering member of His Body.

Because the movie was designed to make money for the producers, I doubt that it is an entirely accurate representation of the Church's teaching. Some day I will go see it, I suppose; it is not something I look forward to at all.

Some Observations

Tag line: "You can only defeat it when you believe."[1]
We don't defeat the evil spirits; Jesus has defeated them and shares His victory with us. Our faith is not in our faith; our faith is never any greater than a mustard seed compared to the greatness of God's love and compassion for us.
Symptoms of possession
"The Ritual gives three signs that indicate the possible presence of a demon: abnormal strength, the ability to speak or understand a previously unknown language, and the knowledge of hidden things."[2]
Our culture is vulnerable
"Where faith decreases, superstition grows."[3]
An exorcist in every parish?
One review says that the Pope wanted to have "an exorcist in every parish."[4] The normal distribution is at least one exorcist per diocese. Either the movie or the review got mixed up.

Exorcism in Baptism

A prayer of exorcism and preliminary anointing is part of the "Rite of Baptism":

Celebrant: We anoint you with the oil of salvation in the name of Christ our Savior; may he strengthen you with his power, who lives and reigns for ever and ever.
All: Amen.
The Celebrant anoints the child on the breast with the Oil of Catechumens.

The Book

  • Exorcism is hard work.
  • It's not magic.
  • People really suffer; people really find relief.

The Movie vs. The Book

  • No Jesuit exorcist in the book. It's probably a homage to The Exorcist to cast Anthony Hopkins as a Jesuit exorcist.
  • The priest in real life was not going through doubts about the priesthood. He was not sent to Rome because he ministered so well to a woman dying young.
  • Most Jesuits don't live alone--especially not in Rome!
  • 175 films or TV shows on exorcism! That raises certain expectations of what "exorcism" is for the movie's audience.
  • "You must believe in it [evil? Satan?] to defeat it" is not from the book.
  • The real priest never had to "exorcise the exorcist."
    • As critic Alan Brien once wrote of Laurence Olivier, "There is a kind of bad acting of which only a great actor is capable."[5]
  • I hated the Hannibal Lector movies and have no desire to see any Anthony Hopkins movie.

References