New translation of the Mass: Difference between revisions
Line 785: | Line 785: | ||
|''This is'' the Lamb of God, | |''This is'' the Lamb of God, | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''behold him''' who takes away the sins of the world. | |'''behold him''' who takes away [[the sins of the world]]. | ||
|who takes away the sins of the world. | |who takes away [[the sins of the world]]. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''Blessed are those called to the supper of the Lamb.''' | |'''Blessed are those called to the supper of the Lamb.''' |
Revision as of 19:58, 12 November 2011
- The Order of Mass--a complete translation with rubrics.
- The new Ordo goes into effect on the first Sunday of Advent in 2011.
- General Instruction of the Roman Missal (GIRM).
- "Welcoming the Roman Missal." A very detailed site.
The texts below are just some of the changes made in the new Order. There are many variations in the Eucharistic Prayers and the particular prayers for each Mass.
The new translation is called The Roman Missal instead of The Sacramentary.
Background
Previous editions of the Missale Romanum.
Timeline
- Tridentine Mass--a liturgical revision inspired by the Council of Trent (1545-1563) and promulgated by Pope St. Pius V in 1570. With few small changes, this was the Mass used in the Roman rite from 1570 until 1962.
- Vatican II took place from 1962 to 1965. The first document produced by the Council was the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy ("Sacrosanctum Concilium") in 1963. This is what set in motion the revision of the Tridentine Mass.
- 36. 1. Particular law remaining in force, the use of the Latin language is to be preserved in the Latin rites.
- 2. But since the use of the mother tongue, whether in the Mass, the administration of the sacraments, or other parts of the liturgy, frequently may be of great advantage to the people, the limits of its employment may be extended. This will apply in the first place to the readings and directives, and to some of the prayers and chants, according to the regulations on this matter to be laid down separately in subsequent chapters.
- 3. These norms being observed, it is for the competent territorial ecclesiastical authority mentioned in Art. 22, 2, to decide whether, and to what extent, the vernacular language is to be used; their decrees are to be approved, that is, confirmed, by the Apostolic See. And, whenever it seems to be called for, this authority is to consult with bishops of neighboring regions which have the same language.
- 4. Translations from the Latin text into the mother tongue intended for use in the liturgy must be approved by the competent territorial ecclesiastical authority mentioned above.
- International Commission on English in the Liturgy (ICEL) was formed in 1964.
- Between 1965 and 1972, various sections of the Mass were translated into the "vernacular" (local languages) in the Roman Rite.
- Comme le Prévoit, 1969: "Instruction on the translation of liturgical texts for celebrations with a congregation." "The guiding principle of the document was 'dynamic equivalency,' which means to translate basic thoughts rather than words."[1]
- The third edition of the Missale Romanum was published in Latin in 1972. The first complete English translation of the Sacramentary was in 1973.
- Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, Fifth Instruction. “For the Right Implementation of the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy of the Second Vatican Council†(Sacrosanctum Concilium, art. 36). "Liturgiam authenticam: On the Use of Vernacular Languages in the Publication of the Books of the Roman Liturgy," 28 March 2001.
Moral of the Timeline
1. The faith is translatable into any human language.
- Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek are the founding languages.
- Latin is a later language favored by the Roman hierarchy and embedded in the Latin rite. The translation of the Scriptures, Creed, and liturgy into Latin was a translation into a vernacular language. The purpose of the translation was to make the faith intelligible to believers. The very same impulse that gave us Latin drives us to keep on translating the faith into today's vernacular languages.
- There are 3 Latin rites and 22 Eastern rites in the Catholic Church. There are many liturgical languages used in the Eastern rites. All of the Latin rites have been translated into local languages.
- "Justin, one of the earliest and most reliable authorities on the Eucharistic rite of the primitive Church, already speaks of that fertility of dramatic inspiration which evidently surrounded the Eucharistic mysteries from the very beginning. The celebrant is said by him to offer up Eucharists with great abundance, as much as his strength allows, clearly pointing to a liberty of improvisation which had not been checked by definitive canons of the Liturty."[2]
2. Idiomatic translations ("dynamic equivalence") are, in principle, valid for the sacraments where the translations have been approved by the Church. Nothing extra is given sacramentally by using the Latin itself or a word-for-word translation ("formal equivalence"). The sacrament of the Mass is not being changed one whit by the change of the words and word order of the liturgy.
- Some commentators call an idiomatic translation a "dumbing-down" of the literal translation. I think that mentality does more harm than good. It is not a "dumbing-down" to explain, for example, that "consubstantial" means "one in being." We have to speak English to English speakers if the gospel is to be preached effectively.
3. The 1972 English translators went off the deep end. In some cases, they abused the freedom given them to seek to express the meanings of the prayers in an English idiom and instead substituted their own spirituality for that of the Church. This is lamentable. Their excesses have brought about an extreme reaction in favor of word-for-word (even letter-for-letter!) translations.
4. The proposition that "the new translation is more accurate, beautiful, profound, and exalted than the old translation" is not an article of faith. I may question this assertion and withhold assent to any part of it without in any way acting against the faith. I accept the authority of the Church to tell me how to celebrate the sacraments; I do not accept the authority of the Latin literalists to tell me what is beautiful and appropriate for the liturgy.
5. When the Church translated from Greek into Latin, Latin was the vernacular language! The purpose of the translation was not to create a sacred language that would last 1600 years, but to make the Greek intelligible to the people. Latin was substantially the language of educated Europe up through the Renaissance. The fixity of Latin--the sense that it is something holy, sacred, different from our ordinary language--is something that has come into being only in the last few centuries. It is an historical accident.
Serious problems with 1973 Sacramentary
Example of a loose translation
- Opening Prayer for 21st Sunday of Ordinary Time[3]
Latin | literal | dynamic |
---|---|---|
Deus, qui fidelium mentes unius efficis voluntatis, | O God, You who make the minds of the faithful to be of one will, | Father, help us to seek the values |
da populis tuis id amare quod praecipis, | grant unto Your people to love that ... which You command, | that will bring us lasting joy |
id desiderare quod promittis, | to desire that which You promise, | |
ut, inter mundanas varietates, | so that, amidst the vicissitudes of this world, | in this changing world. |
ibi nostra fixa sint corda, ubi vera sunt gaudia. | our hearts may there be fixed where true joys are. | In our desire for what you promise make us one in mind and heart. |
Omission of words and phrases from the Eucharistic Prayers
I need to get some examples ...
Et cum spiritu tuo
This dialogue between the priest and congregation takes place five times in the Mass:
"The Lord be with you." "And with your spirit."
- Introductory Rite.
- Before the Gospel.
- In the Preface.
- Communion Rite.
- Dismissal.
Introductory Rites
The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the communion [vs. "fellowship"] of the Holy Spirit be with you all.
Confiteor
New Ordo | Old Ordo |
---|---|
I confess to almighty God and to you, my brothers and sisters, |
I confess to almighty God, and to you, my brothers and sisters, |
that I have greatly sinned, | that I have sinned |
[And, striking their breast, they say:]
through my fault, through my fault, |
through my own fault |
in my thoughts and in my words, in what I have done and in what I have failed to do, |
in my thoughts and in my words, in what I have done, and in what I have failed to do; |
therefore I ask blessed Mary ever-Virgin, all the Angels and Saints, |
and I ask blessed Mary, ever virgin, all the angels and saints, |
[The absolution of the Priest follows:]
May almighty God have mercy on us,
forgive us our sins,
and bring us to everlasting life.
Confessing more grandly and more humbly
- "The new translation does have us express more grandly the seriousness of our sin and the sincerity of our contrition. It offers a humbler way to collect ourselves before stepping any further into prayer."
- I don't feel the humble grandeur of the new translation nor do I picture myself 'stepping ... further into prayer' after the Penitential Act. More power to those who do see and feel things this way.
Alternative Penitential Act
New Ordo | Old Ordo |
---|---|
P: Have mercy on us, O Lord. | P: Lord, we have sinned against you: Lord, have mercy. |
R: For we have sinned against you. | R: Lord, have mercy. |
P: Show us, O Lord, your mercy. | P: Lord, show us your mercy and love. |
R: And grant us your salvation. | R: And grant us your salvation. |
Gloria
New Ordo | Old Ordo |
---|---|
Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace to people of good will. |
Glory to God in the highest, and peace to his people on earth. |
We praise you, we bless you, |
Lord God, heavenly King, almighty God and Father, we worship you, |
Lord Jesus Christ, Only Begotten Son, Lord God, Lamb of God, Son of the Father, |
Lord Jesus Christ, only Son of the Father, Lord God, Lamb of God, |
you take away the sins of the world, have mercy on us; |
you take away the sin of the world: have mercy on us; |
you take away the sins of the world, receive our prayer; |
|
you are seated at the right hand of the Father, have mercy on us. |
you are seated at the right hand of the Father: receive our prayer. |
For you alone are the Holy One, you alone are the Lord, |
For you alone are the Holy One, you alone are the Lord, |
Common ending to Collects
New Ordo | Old Ordo |
---|---|
Through our Lord Jesus Christ, | Through our Lord Jesus Christ, |
your Son, | your Son, |
who lives and reigns with you | who lives and reigns with you |
in the unity of the Holy Spirit, | and the Holy Spirit, |
one God, for ever and ever. Amen. | one God, for ever and ever. Amen. |
Liturgy of the Word
Prayer for the Deacon
May the Lord be in your heart and on your lips
that you may proclaim his Gospel worthily and well,
in the name of the Father and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.
Creed
New Ordo | Old Ordo |
---|---|
I believe in one God, the Father almighty, |
We believe in one God, the Father, the Almighty, |
I believe in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Only Begotten Son of God, |
We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the only Son of God, |
and by the Holy Spirit was incarnate of the Virgin Mary, |
by the power of the Holy Spirit he was born of the Virgin Mary, |
I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son, |
We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son. |
I believe in one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church. I confess one baptism for the forgiveness of sins |
We believe in one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church. We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins. |
Consubstantial
- Latin, consubstantialis: "an adjective used in Latin Christian christology, coined by Tertullian in Against Hermogenes 44, used to translate the Greek term homoousios. 'Consubstantial' describes the relationship among the Divine persons of the Christian Trinity and connotes that God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit are "of one being" in that the Son is 'generated' ('born' or 'begotten') 'before all ages' or 'eternally' of the Father's own being, from which the Spirit also eternally 'proceeds.'"
- Substance vs. accident.
- Transubstantiation.
- "Consubstantial" is just a transliteration of a translation. It still has to be explained in plain English. If all we can do is transliterate, it would be better to transliterate (and explain) the Greek original: homoousios (á½Î¼Î¿Î¿Ïσιος).
- ὁμοούσιος
- Turner
- "'Consubstantial.' This word is a mouthful. In the entire revised translation of the Mass, this is probably the one word that will raise the most eyebrows. It replaces the expression 'one in Being,' and it describes the relationship between Jesus and the Father. In the previous translation, 'one in Being' was thought to be more comprehensible and closer to the original Greek of the Creed. However, the revised translation chooses a word that lies closer to the Latin equivalent, consubstantialis".[5]
- There are pretty good reasons for thinking that "one in Being" is "more comprehensible and closer to the original Greek of the Creed." The Greek is ομοουσιος (homoousios), meaning "same being." The Latin translation of the Greek means "substantial with." Which is "more comprehensible and closer to the original Greek"? "One in Being" or "substantial with"? "Consubstantial" necessarily was intended to mean "ομοουσιος."
- "'Consubstantial' is a very unusual word. We don't use it for anything else. But it is describing a very unusual thing--the nature of Jesus Christ. He is not like anything or anyone else."[6]
- In other words, we are inflicting a word that has no natural meaning in English in place of an excellent phrase that captures the teaching of the Nicene Creed. I think this is mere pedantry.
- Turner is also theologically inaccurate in saying that this phrase is about "the nature of Jesus Christ." It is a doctrine about the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity, who is one-in-being with the Father before all time because of His divine nature and who assumed a human nature when He took flesh in the Virgin's womb. Jesus Christ is a single Divine Person who possess two natures, not one. In His divine nature, He is consubstantial with the Father and the Holy Spirit; in His human nature, He is not.
God the Son Suffered
- "'Suffered death.' This replaces two verbs in the previous translation, "suffered, died." The Latin is ambiguous. Literally, it says, he suffered and was buried ["passus et sepultus est"], and the word suffered implies his dying. Because the verb died is not there in the Latin, "suffered death" seems a better way to express what happened to Jesus. The point here is that he really died, and that is what gives his Resurrection its full meaning" (22).
- After all of Turner's praise of the precision and excellence of Latin and his insistence on the need to bend English to the patterns of the Latin language, both in word order and in the choice of vocabulary derived from Latin roots, he here defends inserting a word that is not in the Latin and in such a way that a beauty of the old translation is lost.
- If all that the Nicene Fathers intended to say was that Jesus died, they could have done so either in Greek or Latin. The emphasis on His real suffering on the Cross was part of the Church's rejection of docetism. Because I am not a Latinate literalist, I don't mind adding a word in English to clarify that Jesus died before He was buried; I much prefer the old translation to the new. The Church has the authority to tell me what words to say in the Creed; it does not have the authority to say, "You must believe that this is 'a better way to express what happened to Jesus.'"
- The old translation indicated that Jesus "really died." But it separated the fact that He really suffered from the fact that He died. The new translation runs those two separate ideas together--without any justification in the text for doing so.
Liturgy of the Eucharist
Offertory Prayers
Prayers over the gifts
Prayer over the bread | |
new ordo | old ordo |
---|---|
Blessed are you, Lord God of all creation, | Blessed are you, Lord God of all creation, |
for through your goodness we have received | Through your goodness we have |
the bread we offer you: | this bread to offer, |
fruit of the earth | which earth has given |
and work of human hands, | and human hands have made. |
It will become for us the bread of life. | It will become for us the bread of life. |
Prayer over the wine | |
Blessed are you, Lord God of all creation, | Blessed are you, Lord God of all creation, |
for through your goodness we have received | Through your goodness we have |
the wine we offer you: | this wine to offer, |
fruit of the vine and work of human hands | fruit of the vine and work of human hands |
It will become our spiritual drink. | It will become our spiritual drink. |
Accept our sacrifice
Lord God, | |
With humble spirit and contrite heart | |
may we be accepted by you, O Lord, | we ask You to receive us |
and may our sacrifice in your sight this day | |
be pleasing to You, | and be pleased with |
the sacrifice we offer you | |
Lord God. | |
with humble and contrite hearts. |
- Remarks on the changes:
- 1. Changed word order in several places.
- 2. An additional "O Lord" added in the middle.
- 3. "Humble spirit and contrite heart" vs. "Humble and contrite hearts." Note the difference in number between the new "heart" and the old "hearts."
- 4. "May our sacrifice in your sight this day" replaces "the sacrifice we offer you."
- 5. "Suscipiamur" is translated as "accept" instead of as "be accepted." This is less literal than the old translation! The Latin is clearly passive voice, not active.
Pray, brethren
Pray, brethren (brothers and sisters), | Pray, brethren |
that my sacrifice and yours | that our sacrifice |
may be acceptable to God, | may be acceptable to God, |
the almighty Father. | the almighty Father. |
Preface
P: The Lord be with you.
R: And with your spirit.
P: Lift up your hearts.
R: We lift them up to the Lord.
P: Let us give thanks to the Lord our God.
R: It is right and just.
Sanctus
Holy, Holy, Holy Lord God of hosts [vs. "power and might"].
Heaven and earth are full of your glory.
Hosanna in the highest.
Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord.
Hosanna in the highest.
Consecration
See my notes on the Institution Narratives for a more extended treatment of the pro multis phrase.
New Ordo | Old Ordo |
---|---|
Take this, all of you, and drink from it, for this is the chalice of my blood, |
Take this, all of you, and drink from it: this is the cup of my blood, |
Mysterium fidei
"The mystery of faith" [vs. "Let us proclaim the mystery of faith"].
We proclaim your Death, O Lord,
and profess your Resurrection
until you come again.
Or:
When we eat this Bread and drink this Cup,
we proclaim your Death, O Lord,
until you come again.
Or:
Save us, Savior of the world,
for by your Cross and Resurrection
you have set us free.
Eucharistic Prayers
The Latin rite has a multitude of forms:
- The extraordinary form (Tridentine Mass)
- Four basic Eucharistic Prayers
- Two Eucharist Prayers for Reconciliation
- Four Eucharistic Prayers for use with Masses for Various Needs
- Three Eucharistic Prayers for Masses with Children
That is 14 official (licit) versions of the Eucharistic Prayer.
Eucharistic Prayer II
You are indeed Holy, O Lord, | Lord, you are holy indeed, |
the fount of all holiness. | the fountain of all holiness. |
Make holy, therefore, these gifts, we pray, | Let your Spirit come upon these gifts to make them holy, |
by sending down your Spirit upon them like the dewfall, | |
so that they may become for us | so that they may become for us |
the Body and + Blood of our Lord Jesus Christ. | the body and blood of our Lord, Jesus Christ. |
At the time he was betrayed | Before he was given up to death, |
and entered willingly into his Passion, | a death he freely accepted, |
he took bread and, giving thanks, | he took bread and gave you thanks, |
broke it, and gave it to his disciples, saying: | He broke the bread, gave it to his disciples, and said: |
See the notes on the Consecration and Anamnesis | |
Therefore, as we celebrate | |
the memorial of his Death and Resurrection, | In memory of his death and resurrection, |
we offer you, Lord, | we offer you, Father, |
the Bread of life and the Chalice of salvation, | this life-giving bread, this saving cup. |
giving thanks that you have held us worthy | We thank you for counting us worthy |
to be in your presence and minister to you. | to stand in your presence and serve you. |
Humbly we pray | |
that, partaking of the Body and Blood of Christ, | May all of us who share in the body and blood of Christ |
we may be gathered into one by the Holy Spirit. | be brought together in unity by the Holy Spirit. |
Remember, Lord, your Church, | Lord, remember your Church |
spread throughout the world, | throughout the world; |
and bring her to the fullness of charity, | make us grow in love, |
together with N. our Pope and N. our Bishop | together with N. our Pope, N. our Bishop |
and all the clergy. | and all the clergy. |
[In Masses for the Dead, the following may be added:] | |
Remember your servant N., | |
whom you have called (today) | |
from this world to yourself. | |
Grant that he (she) who was united with your Son in a death like his, | |
may also be one with him in his Resurrection. | |
Remember also our brothers and sisters | Remember our brothers and sisters |
who have fallen asleep in the hope of the resurrection, | who have gone to their rest in the hope of rising again; |
and all who have died in your mercy: | bring them and all the departed |
welcome them into the light of your face. | into the light of your presence |
Have mercy on us all, we pray, | Have mercy on us all |
that with the Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of God, | make us worthy to share eternal life with Mary, the virgin Mother of God, |
with the blessed Apostles, | with the apostles, |
and all the Saints who have pleased you throughout the ages, | and with all the saints who have done your will throughout the ages. |
we may merit to be coheirs to eternal life, | |
and may praise and glorify you | May we praise you in union with them, and give you glory |
through your Son, Jesus Christ. | through your Son, Jesus Christ. |
Per ipsum
New Ordo | Old Ordo |
---|---|
Through him, and with him, and in him, | Through him, and with him, and in him, |
O God, almighty Father, | |
in the unity of the Holy Spirit, |
in the unity of the Holy Spirit, |
all glory and honor is yours, | all glory and honor is yours, |
almighty Father, | |
for ever and ever. Amen. | for ever and ever. Amen. |
Libera nos
New Ordo | Old Ordo |
---|---|
Deliver us, Lord, we pray, from every evil, graciously grant peace in our days, |
Deliver us, Lord, from every evil, and grant us peace in our day. |
Kiss of peace
New Ordo | Old Ordo |
---|---|
Lord Jesus Christ, who said to your Apostles, |
Lord Jesus Christ, you said to your apostles: |
Priest: The peace of the Lord be with you always.
People: "And with your spirit."
Communion rites
Prayers of the priest
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of the living God,
who by the will of the Father
and the work of the Holy Spirit,
through your Death gave life to the world;
free me by this, your most holy Body and Blood,
from all my sins and from every evil;
keep me always faithful to your commandments,
and never let me be parted from you.
Or:
May the receiving of your Body and Blood,
Lord Jesus Christ,
not bring me to judgment and condemnation,
but through your loving mercy
be for me protection in mind and body,
and a healing remedy.
Behold, the Lamb of God
new ordo | old ordo |
---|---|
Behold the Lamb of God, | This is the Lamb of God, |
behold him who takes away the sins of the world. | who takes away the sins of the world. |
Blessed are those called to the supper of the Lamb. | Happy are those who are called to his supper. |
The Centurion's Prayer
new ordo | old ordo |
---|---|
Lord, I am not worthy | Lord, I am not worthy |
that you should enter under my roof, | to receive you |
but only say the word | but only say the word |
and my soul shall be healed. | and I shall be healed. |
Latin: Domine, non sum dignus ut intres sub tectum meum.
"Servant" vs. "soul" vs. "I".
In defense of the decision to institute a strict translation of "pro multis" as "for many," Cardinal Arinze argues that "'For many' is a faithful translation of pro multis, whereas 'for all' is rather an explanation of the sort that belongs properly to catechesis."[7] Would that the same line of reasoning had been applied here! In my view, the connection of the Centurion's Prayer to the 1973 translation is the kind of thing "that belongs properly to catechesis." I much prefer the liturgically-based interpretation, "Lord I am not worthy to receive You, but only say the word and I shall be healed." In the liturgical moment, we are not about to ask Jesus to "come under our roof" (i.e., enter our house) but to enter into the very core of our being. We are about to receive Jesus in our heart of hearts. The imagery that the Centurion used was perfectly appropriate to his situation; the 1973 interpretation was perfectly appropriate to the liturgical situation.
Communion prayers of the priest
May the Body of Christ keep me safe for eternal life.
May the Blood of Christ keep me safe for eternal life.
Purification of the vessels
What has passed our lips as food, O Lord,
may we possess in purity of heart,
that what has been given to us in time
may be our healing for eternity.
Dismissal
Go forth, the Mass is ended.
Or:
Go and announce the Gospel of the Lord.
Or:
Go in peace, glorifying the Lord by your life.
Or:
Go in peace.
Notable changes
- Thomas Kocik, "The 'Johanno-Pauline Missal'":
New or restored memorials
- Most Holy Name of Jesus (Jan. 3)
- St. Josephine Bakhita (Feb. 8)
- St. Adalbert (Apr. 23)
- St. Louis Marie Grignon de Montfort (Apr. 28)
- Blessed Virgin Mary of Fatima (May 13)
- Ss. Christopher Magallanes & Companions (May 21)
- St. Rita of Cascia (May 22)
- Ss. Augustine Zhao Rong & Companions (July 9)
- St. Apollinaris (July 20)
- St. Sharbel Makhluf (July 24)
- St. Peter Julian Eymard (Aug. 2)
- St. Teresa Benedicta of the Cross (Aug. 9)
- St. Maximilian Mary Kolbe (Aug. 14)
- St. Peter Claver (Sept. 9)
- Most Holy Name of Mary (Sept. 12)
- Ss. Andrew Kim Taegon, Paul Chong Hasang & Companions (Sept. 20)
- Ss. Lawrence Ruiz & Companions (Sept. 28)
- Ss. Andrew Dung-Lac & Companions (Nov. 24)
- St. Catherine of Alexandria (Nov. 25)
Other additions and modifications
- New preface for martyrs
- New options for prefaces of the Common of the B.V.M.
- Four new Eucharistic Prayers Pro Variis Necessitatibus (Appendix to the Order of Mass, pp. 687-702) and three new Eucharistic Prayers Pro Missis cum Pueris (Appendix VI, pp. 1271-88), in addition to the two Eucharistic Prayers De Reconciliatione (Appendix to the Order of Mass, pp. 675-85); these last two are contained in the Missal of 1975.
- Mass for the Remission of Sins (from the 1962 Missal)
- Mass for Continence (from the 1962 Missal)
- Three new votive Masses of the Divine Mercy
- Octave Sunday of Easter ("Low Sunday") termed Divine Mercy Sunday
- Each weekday of Advent has its own orations
- Each weekday of Easter has its own orations
- The Orationes super populum (Prayers over the people) for Lenten weekdays are restored (mainly from the 1962 Missal)
- Gregorian chant no longer relegated to an appendix
Commentaries
Moleski
I accept the authority of the Church to provide directions on how the sacraments are to be celebrated. I will submit to the Church's decisions with as much enthusiasm as I can muster for the project, for "God loves a cheerful giver" (1 Cor 9:7).
The obedience of faith requires me to say the Mass as the Church wants it to be said. I am not obliged to agree with the aesthetic theories advanced by advocates of the change. I retain my freedom of judgment about the quality of the translation and of the arguments advanced in its favor.
I don't believe that adjusting the language of the liturgy will renew the Church. The translation done in 1973 may well have been heavily influenced by modernism; merely undoing some small part of the work of the modernists will not root them out of the Church.
I was an English major in my undergraduate work at Boston College. My honors thesis was on poetics. I am not a poet myself, but I have some feel for how sound and sense work both in English and Latin. My heart sinks as I read the new texts. I am not thrilled by the turn to Latin roots.
Besides my work in English literature and poetics, I have studied Latin, Greek, Hebrew, Spanish, French, German, and Russian at some length; I dabble in a few Italian and Portuguese phrases. I also taught myself assembly language (ASM), BASIC, Pascal, C, C++ (Object Oriented Programing--OOP), PHP, MySQL, and javascript. I think I understand how translation works.
The liturgists who ushered in the 1973 translation almost certainly wrote pamphlets and books celebrating the wonders that would result from their work, just as the liturgists are doing with this translation. I don't believe that the liturgists as a group possess the gift of prophecy. If good fruit comes from this change, thanks be to God; if not, I will do my level best to pick up my cross and follow Jesus wherever He leads me.
Piety can't be imposed by law
Changing the words of the liturgy won't bring about a change of heart in the impious. They may give lip-service to the new texts but remain unrepentant within. Dissent and assent are incompatible. Dissenting Catholics have made a fine art of superficial adherence to the Church's teachings.
- "There never was a time since the apostles’ day when the Church was not; and there never was a time but men were to be found who preferred some other way of worship to the Church’s way. These two kinds of professed Christians ever have been — Church Christians and Christians not of the Church; and it is remarkable, I say, that while, on the one hand, reverence for sacred things has been a characteristic of Church Christians on the whole, so, want of reverence has been the characteristic on the whole of Christians not of the Church" (John Henry Newman).
Turner
Are the critics just "ugly Americans"?
Paul Turner, Understanding the Revised Mass Texts, second edition (Chicago: Archdiocese of Chicago, 2010).
- "Citizens of the United States of America ... have a well-earned worldwide reputation for being rather poor at speaking languages other than English. Many students take only the minimum number of hours required for foreign language classes. Those who speak more than one language are considered remarkable by that standard alone. States promote English-only legislation to protect citizens from having to use a second language. Americans expect a person from a different country to speak English whether they meet one another at home or abroad! This phobia concerning foreign languages probably spills into the Church, where some American Catholics regard those who possess a knowledge of Latin with a certain degree of suspicion."
- I have studied Spanish, French, Latin, Russian, Middle English, NT Greek, Hebrew, and German; I'm toying around with Italian, too, on and off. I have no "phobia concerning foreign languages." My criticisms of the liturgical pedants are based on other grounds.
Expect frustration
- "You can count on some frustration when the revised texts appear" (6).
- This prophesy is fulfilled in my reading!
Spare us, O Lord
- "The word 'O' has been added throughout the Missal before words such as 'Lord' and 'God' in sentences that are prayers. It slightly lengthens the one-syllable form of address to God, and intends to show respect."
- They don't add the elegant 'O' in the Penitential Rite, which retains 'Lord, have mercy' and 'Christ, have mercy.' I guess the extraneous 'O' didn't fit in with the grand humility of that part of the new translation.
Must we all say the "same words"?
- "Catholic profess the Creed each Sunday in various languages all around the world. Especially for this part of Mass, it is important that we all say the same words; there is one faith (Ephesians 4:5)."
- If what Turner says were true, then 1) we would all be obliged to say the Creed in Greek, the original language of the New Testament and of the Council of Nicea, and 2) there would be no option to use the Apostles Creed in place of the Nicene Creed. I think that one of the greatest glories of Christianity is its commitment to being translated into any and all human languages. What must be preserved is the meaning, of the Creed, not the words.
Two kinds of sacrifice and priesthood in the Mass
- "You will notice [in the Offertory Rite] the expansion form the words 'our sacrifice' to 'my sacrifice and yours.' In keeping with the Latin text, this implies that more than one sacrifice is being offered. On the one hand, the Mass is a single sacrifice offered by all present. On the other hand, each baptized member of the assembly is offering a sacrifice, in keeping with his or her priestly role; however, each participate in the one sacrifice of Christ" (25).
- This is the second remark of Turner's with which I wholeheartedly agree.
Sursum corda
- "The next part of the dialogue has not changed at all. The priest says, 'Lift up your hearts,' and you answer, 'We lift them up to the Lord.' There was some discussion about changing this translation. In Latin, the words are very spare, and they literally mean something like, Hearts aloft! We hold [them] up to the Lord. In the end, it was thought that the previous translation seemed to achieve the same sense. Because people know these lines so well, no change was recommended."
- I wish that the same merciful and compassionate thinking had been employed in the translation of the Creed.
Amen
- "It brings a smile to the face of many Catholics to know that in the midst of all these changes the translation of the word Amen will be the same. In fact, the word is not translated at all. It's the same word in Latin."
- Yes, I am grateful that they left unchanged a word here and there. I am not grateful for Turner's patronizing tone toward those who disagree with him about the beauty, depth, elegance, grandeur, and humility of the new translation. I think there were other places where things could well have been left alone except for the joy that the changes bring to the Latin literalists.
Per ipsum
- "The doxology [at the end of the Eucharistic prayer] will be slightly different. The main difference here is the word order, which more nearly imitates the flow of the Latin" (35).
- From the work of such imitators, spare us, O Lord!
Consecration
- "The only difference [in the Consecration] is the insertion of the words 'of' and 'for.' The meaning is basically the same, but the new translation expresses that we all share some 'of' the same bread. By partaking of one bread, we become one body in Christ (see 1 Corinthians 10:17). Furthermore, the reason we share this food is because it is the Body of Christ, given up for us. The word 'for' draws out this purpose."
- The word enim, translated as "for," is an insertion in the Latin rite. It is not found in the Scriptures nor in the Eastern rites. This is not a word that has a clear and precise meaning in English, let alone in theology.[8] As with all of the other Latinisms in the new translation, I will stick to the script, but I don't think it is an improvement in the old translation.
- "Instead of 'shed' the revised translation uses 'poured out.' The new verb underlines the ambiguity of the phrase were it occurs. Either a cup or blood may be 'poured out.' The sentence may mean either one. However, only blood can be 'shed'; the previous translation misses this ambiguity in the text" (37-38).
- That is a nice touch. Why didn't this delicacy and tact apply to the translation of 'enim' as 'for'? That translation imposes a meaning on a word that is very subtle--and negligible!--in Latin.
Anamnesis
- "[After the Consecration,] the priest then announces 'the mystery of faith.' You are accustomed to hearing him say, 'Let us proclaim the mystery of faith.' But this is more than what appears in Latin. ... By omitting the words 'Let us,' the new translation should help the priest keep centered on his role" (39).
- So what? When it pleases them, the translators provide "more than what appears in Latin"--as in the case of "The Lord be with you" and "suffered death." This is the kind of small-mindedness on the part of our Latinists that irritates me to no end. I have nothing charitable to say about this kind of reasoning, so I will not say it. Let us pray for our enemies as Jesus taught us to pray.
- "Besides, 'Let us' implies that the priest will also be making the acclamation, which the previous translation has encouraged him to do. But the acclamation is yours to make. The priest is not supposed to join you in it, any more than he should make the response to 'The Body of Christ.' He has made an announcement, and you make an acclamation" (39).
- This is mind-boggling. I cannot find anything in the GIRM that supports this prohibition of the priest joining in the acclamation of faith. By what means will the congregation decide which acclamation to use if the priest does not cue the response? Is the priest not a member of the congregation? What does his participation in the acclamation take away from the congregation?
The Lord's Prayer
- "The Lord's prayer itself has not changed. You will continue to use the same words you have prayed all through your Christian life. Some scripture scholars think they could make a better translation of this prayer from the original Greek of Matthew's account of the Gospel (see 6:9-13). Some people think that the prayer should at least be updated to change the word thy to your. But the Lord's Prayer we know has achieved a level of holiness that cannot be replaced. English speakers have used this translation for many, many years, so no change has been made."
- Another small victory at which the faithful may smile, except that Turner would then accuse them of being small-minded ugly Americans. It's best simply to bow before the wisdom of the liturgists and say, "Yes, father; of course, father; whatever you think is best, father."
Roofs & souls
- "Some Catholics may confuse the word 'roof' with the roof of one's mouth, which may be why the previous translation omits this word. By quoting the centurion, you're telling Jesus of your sins and that you are not worthy to have him enter the place where you live. Your words are about your sinfulness, not a part of your body."
- That is why the old translation is vastly superior to the new revision. What we are about to do when we say this prayer is receive Jesus into our bodies and souls, not have him come under the roof of the place where we live.
Links
- "Roma Locuta Est."
- "Welcoming the New Mass Translation."
- English chants.
- Musical Settings of the Ordinary of the Mass.
- Klaus Gamber, The Reform of the Roman Liturgy: Its Problems and Background. Deals with the error in thinking that the earliest liturgies were celebrated ad populum instead of ad orientem.
- "Timeline of the Roman Missal."
- "Pope Fails Own Latin Test."
References
- ↑ "Timeline of the Roman Missal."
- ↑ Abbot Vonier, A Key to the Doctrine of the Eucharist, p. 160.
- ↑ "21st Sunday of Ordinary Time."
- ↑ USCCB FAQ on "Consubstantial."
- ↑ Paul Turner, Understanding the Revised Mass Texts, second edition (Chicago: Archdiocese of Chicago, 2010), 22.
- ↑ Paul Turner, Understanding the Revised Mass Texts, second edition (Chicago: Archdiocese of Chicago, 2010), 22.
- ↑ Cf. the section on "Pro Multis." for the full text of Arinze's letter.
- ↑ Jimmy Akin, "Enim?"