[ Main Page | Table of Contents | Previous | Next ]
Sections:
The following section is a frequently asked questions list with answers. They are listed in no particular order.
Use to be the best way to determine readership was via the newsgroup reports that were posted monthly by Brian Reid reid@pa.dec.com to news.lists. This is no longer supported. The real answer is “Guess”.
None. The best process is for the moderator to read the group from another site and cancel anything posted to his/her group by 'outsiders'. (You should try to do it from another site, in general, because the type of person who posts their own stuff to a moderated group frequently puts your “official” site in the Path: line in an attempt to keep you from seeing the posting.)
Yes. Sometimes a moderator's employer understands the importance of news moderation, and the effort involved in doing a good job, and allows the employee to perform some moderation tasks during working hours, or on the employer's equipment. This potentially gives the organization greater visibility through an Organization: header or signature file in the moderator's postings. While the moderator is not being directly paid for moderation duties, their normal compensation covers time spent working on the newsgroup.
The group comp.research.japan received a grant from the U.S. Office of Naval Research to help support the operation of the group. There have been other research oriented groups that have received support, but to-date moderation is usually a volunteer position with no compensation other than a grateful community.
A complaint a moderator hears from time to time concerns lost submissions. There are several reasons for these complaints.
Every system that runs the news software has its own set of article expiration times set by its news administrator. The admin sets the expiration period depending on how many groups they carry and how much disk space is available. As a full news feed is over 100 MBytes a day and rising, some groups are set to expire very rapidly. That is probably what is happening to the articles your users are worried about. Most news admins expire articles faster in groups they think are less important, to make space for those they think really matter. For example, some sites keep alt. groups only 1-2 days but keep the comp.* groups much longer.
Tell the readers having the problem to talk to their local news admins. Most will extend the life of a particular group their users say they find important to them.
There is a way that you can indicate that your articles should not be expired so quickly as the rest - the Expires: header. However, this should not be used for normal articles as it is not reasonable to try to override the local news admin's policy on how to use the limited disk space on their systems. If your group has an FAQ or other regular monthly information posting, though, you may like to use the Expires: header on that article - look in news.answers for lots of FAQ articles, many of which will have an Expires:
Note however that, partly because of misuse of the Expires: header in the past, some systems no longer support it and expire all articles at the same rate. The only real way your users can be sure of keeping the articles long enough is for them to get the support of their local news admin.
[ Main Page | Table of Contents | Previous | Next ] <html>
<small> <em>NetNews Moderator's Handbook</em> © <a href=copyright.html>Copyright <strong>The Landfield Group</strong>, 1996-2001</a> <br>All rights reserved </small>
</html>